You have to give credit to the majority of Oklahoma’s congressional delegation for the willingness to take tough positions against publicly popular legislation. Four out of our five Representatives had the balls (including Mary Fallin) to reconsider a resolution honoring America’s mothers.
H. Res. 1113
Whereas Mother’s Day is celebrated on the second Sunday of each May;
Whereas the first official Mother’s Day was observed on May 10, 1908, in Grafton, West Virginia, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
Whereas 2008 is the 100th anniversary of the first official Mother’s Day observation;
Whereas in 1908, Elmer Burkett, a U.S. Senator from Nebraska, proposed making Mother’s Day a national holiday;
Whereas in 1914, Congress passed a resolution designating the second Sunday of May as Mother’s Day;
Whereas it is estimated that there are more than 82,000,000 mothers in the United States;
Whereas mothers have made immeasurable contributions toward building strong families, thriving communities, and ultimately a strong Nation;
Whereas the services rendered to the children of the United States by their mothers have strengthened and inspired the Nation throughout its history;
Whereas we honor ourselves and mothers in the United States when we revere and emphasize the importance of the role of the home and family as the true foundation of the Nation;
Whereas mothers continue to rise to the challenge of raising their families with love, understanding, and compassion, while overcoming the challenges of modern society; and
Whereas May 11, 2008 is recognized as Mother’s Day: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives celebrates the role of mothers in the United States and supports the goals and ideals of Mother’s Day.
For the record:
- 5/7/2008 2:11pm: Resolution considered
- 5/7/2008 2:19pm: Agreed to by recorded vote: 412 - 0 (Roll no. 274)
Just as I expected, no opposition. Now, perhaps Congress can consider more pressing issues.
- 5/7/2008 2:20pm: Mr. Tiahrt moved to reconsider the vote.
Say what? The vote was unanimous! What’s to reconsider; the celebration of Mothers Day, or supporting the goals and ideals?
Then, wouldn’t you know it, a congresswomen, who just happens to also be a mother, moves to table the motion to reconsider.
- 5/7/2008 2:20pm: Ms. Castor moved to table the motion to reconsider the vote
So then the fight begins over support of motherhood.
- 5/7/2008 2:27pm: On motion to table the motion to reconsider the vote Agreed to by recorded vote: 237 - 178 (Roll no. 275)
Aye - Boren
No - Cole, Fallin, Lucas, Sullivan
In fact, all 178 noes were Republicans. But they did have their reasons:
Republicans, unhappy with the Democratic majority, have been using such procedural tactics as this all week to bring the House to a standstill, but the assault on mothers may have gone too far. House Minority Leader John Boehner, asked yesterday to explain why he and 177 of his colleagues switched their votes, answered: “Oh, we just wanted to make sure that everyone was on record in support of Mother’s Day.”
By voting against it?
Lucky for people with mothers that Republicans aren’t in the majority. Still, I’m not holding my breath on a Father’s Day this year.